AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks. The issue of representing attacks to attacks in argumentation is receiving an increasing attention as a useful conceptual modelling tool in several contexts. In this paper we present AFRA, a formalism encompassing unlimited recursive attacks within argumentation frameworks. AFRA satisfies the basic requirements of definition simplicity and rigorous compatibility with Dung’s theory of argumentation. This paper provides a complete development of the AFRA formalism complemented by illustrative examples and a detailed comparison with other recursive attack formalizations.

References in zbMATH (referenced in 30 articles , 1 standard article )

Showing results 1 to 20 of 30.
Sorted by year (citations)

1 2 next

  1. Cayrol, C.; Fandinno, J.; Fariñas del Cerro, L.; Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks (2021)
  2. Hung, Nguyen Duy; Huynh, Van-Nam: Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications (2021)
  3. Alfano, Gianvincenzo; Greco, Sergio; Parisi, Francesco; Trubitsyna, Irina: On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach (2020)
  4. Mantadelis, Theofrastos; Bistarelli, Stefano: Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view (2020)
  5. Wu, Jiachao; Li, Lingqiang; Sun, Weihua: Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees (2020)
  6. Gottifredi, Sebastian; Cohen, Andrea; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations (2018)
  7. Gottifredi, Sebastian; Tamargo, Luciano H.; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems (2018)
  8. Polberg, Sylwia; Hunter, Anthony: Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches (2018)
  9. Riveret, Régis; Baroni, Pietro; Gao, Yang; Governatori, Guido; Rotolo, Antonino; Sartor, Giovanni: A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation (2018)
  10. Hung, Nguyen Duy: Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation (2017)
  11. Charwat, Günther; Dvořák, Wolfgang; Gaggl, Sarah A.; Wallner, Johannes P.; Woltran, Stefan: Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey (2015)
  12. Cohen, Andrea; Gottifredi, Sebastian; García, Alejandro J.; Simari, Guillermo R.: An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support (2015)
  13. Baroni, Pietro; Boella, Guido; Cerutti, Federico; Giacomin, Massimiliano; van der Torre, Leendert; Villata, Serena: On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks (2014)
  14. Cayrol, Claudette; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding (2013)
  15. Polberg, Sylwia; Wallner, Johannes Peter; Woltran, Stefan: Admissibility in the abstract dialectical framework (2013)
  16. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert: A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory (2013)
  17. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation (2012)
  18. Villata, Serena; Boella, Guido; Gabbay, Dov M.; van der Torre, Leendert; Hulstijn, Joris: A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks (2012)
  19. Amgoud, Leila; Devred, Caroline; Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine: Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems (2011)
  20. Baroni, P.; Dunne, P. E.; Giacomin, M.: On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance (2011)

1 2 next